Disruptive vs Normative Behaviors - Revision history

Flc: /* Introduction */

2026-02-22T05:44:31Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 22 February 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]		[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]

	This article aims to provide some information on two fundamental tendencies that can be read from the adaptive profiles: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[~~Performance_at_Heart~~\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.		This article aims to provide some information on two fundamental tendencies that can be read from the adaptive profiles: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Adaptive_Profile\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.

	=Generalities=		=Generalities=

Flc at 05:39, 22 February 2026

2026-02-22T05:39:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:39, 22 February 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Introduction=
	[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]		[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]

Flc: /* Normative behaviors */

2025-08-31T22:02:44Z

Normative behaviors

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 31 August 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	These behaviors also correspond to personal efficacy in situations of change<ref>Hill, T., Smith, N. D., Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of self-efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (2), 307-313.</ref>, in environments where it is necessary to resist in order to accept negative feedback<ref>Nease A., Mudget B., Quinones M. (1999). Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 84, No. 5, p 806-814.</ref>, or in situations where it is necessary to show persistence in order to perform over time in the face of adversity<ref>Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Larkin, K. C. (1987). Comparison of three theoretically-derived variables predicting career and academic behaviour: Self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequential thinking. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 293-298.</ref> or to demonstrate stronger-than-average performance<ref>Luthans F., Stajkovic A., Luthans B. C., Luthans K. W. (1998). Applying Behavioral Management in Eastern Europe. European Management Journal. Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 466-475.</ref>. Disruptive behavior is partially located in the Extraversion and Neuroticism dimensions and inversely in the Agreeable and Conscientious dimensions of the five-factor approach, without an exact correspondence, particularly regarding the clinical aspects of the dimensions, which are out of focus for GRI.		These behaviors also correspond to personal efficacy in situations of change<ref>Hill, T., Smith, N. D., Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of self-efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (2), 307-313.</ref>, in environments where it is necessary to resist in order to accept negative feedback<ref>Nease A., Mudget B., Quinones M. (1999). Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 84, No. 5, p 806-814.</ref>, or in situations where it is necessary to show persistence in order to perform over time in the face of adversity<ref>Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Larkin, K. C. (1987). Comparison of three theoretically-derived variables predicting career and academic behaviour: Self-efficacy, interest congruence, and consequential thinking. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 293-298.</ref> or to demonstrate stronger-than-average performance<ref>Luthans F., Stajkovic A., Luthans B. C., Luthans K. W. (1998). Applying Behavioral Management in Eastern Europe. European Management Journal. Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 466-475.</ref>. Disruptive behavior is partially located in the Extraversion and Neuroticism dimensions and inversely in the Agreeable and Conscientious dimensions of the five-factor approach, without an exact correspondence, particularly regarding the clinical aspects of the dimensions, which are out of focus for GRI.

	=Normative ~~behaviors~~=		=Normative Behaviors=
	For these normative behaviors, factor 4 is high (to the right of the profile), and factor 1 is low (to the left of the profile) and higher than factor 1 (to the right of factor 1). See Figure 3 below.		For these normative behaviors, factor 4 is high (to the right of the profile), and factor 1 is low (to the left of the profile) and higher than factor 1 (to the right of factor 1). See Figure 3 below.

Flc: /* Generalities */

2025-08-27T20:51:08Z

Generalities

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 27 August 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Behaviors that characterize how we communicate, socialize, and interact can be analyzed through a limited number of factors<ref>Saucier, G. (2003). An Alternative Multi-language Structure for Personality Attributes. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 17, p. 179-205.</ref>. This result comes from work initially undertaken by Allport & Allport<ref>Allport F. H., Allport G. W. (1921). Personality Traits: their classification and measurement. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology. Vol 16., p 7-40.</ref>, Thurstone<ref>Thurstone L. L. (1934). The Vectors of Mind. Psychological Review, Vol. 41, p. 1-32.<br/>Thurstone L. L. (1959). The measurement of Values. The University of Chicago Press.</ref>, Allport & Odbert<ref>Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1–171.</ref>, and others who researched adjective lexicons and the concept of personality. Factor analysis leads to a relatively small number of transposable factors between cultures for describing behavior.		Behaviors that characterize how we communicate, socialize, and interact can be analyzed through a limited number of factors<ref>Saucier, G. (2003). An Alternative Multi-language Structure for Personality Attributes. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 17, p. 179-205.</ref>. This result comes from work initially undertaken by Allport & Allport<ref>Allport F. H., Allport G. W. (1921). Personality Traits: their classification and measurement. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology. Vol 16., p 7-40.</ref>, Thurstone<ref>Thurstone L. L. (1934). The Vectors of Mind. Psychological Review, Vol. 41, p. 1-32.<br/>Thurstone L. L. (1959). The measurement of Values. The University of Chicago Press.</ref>, Allport & Odbert<ref>Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1–171.</ref>, and others who researched adjective lexicons and the concept of personality. Factor analysis leads to a relatively small number of transposable factors between cultures for describing behavior.

	The four factors measured by GRI, called factors 1, 2, 3, and 4<ref>The factors are purposely called by numbers to avoid biases and misunderstandings attached to labelling</ref>, can be compared with the findings from Marston<ref>Marston W. M. (2002. Emotions of Normal People. Routledge. First published in 1928.</ref>, Burt<ref>Burt, C. L. (1950). The factorial study of emotions. In M. L. Reymert, Ed., Feelings and Emotions. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 531-551.</ref>, and Clarke<ref>Clarke W. V. (1956). Personality Profile of Self-Made Company Presidents. The Journal of Psychology. 41, p. 413-418.</ref> on the feelings and emotions of normal people. These factors also align with the dimensions identified in sociological studies, such as those of Parsons<ref>Parsons T. (1951). The Social System. New York: The Free Press.<br/>Parsons T. (1964). Social structure and personality. New York: The Free Press.</ref>, Parsons & Shils<ref>Parsons, T., Shils, E. A. (2001). Toward a general theory of action.: theoretical foundations for the social science. New York: The Free Press. First published in 1951.</ref>, and Katz & Khan<ref>Katz D., Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization. New York: Wiley. Originellement publié en 1966.</ref>. They were evidenced by studies on the five-factor approach conducted by Goldberg<ref>Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.</ref>, Costa & McCrae<ref>Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, p. 653-665.</ref>, Saucier, Thalmayer, and Payne<ref>Saucier, G., Thalmayer A. G., Payne D. L. (2010). A Basic Bivariate Structure of Personality Attributes Evident Across Nine Languages. Unpublished.</ref>, and other more recent studies on the optimal number of personality factors<ref>De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Timmerman, M. E., de Roover, K., Mlačić, B., Church, A. T. (2014). Towards a Pan-cultural Personality Structure: Input from 11 psychological Studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497-510.</ref>.		The four factors measured by GRI, called factors 1, 2, 3, and 4<ref>The factors are purposely called by numbers to avoid biases and misunderstandings attached to labelling. [[Operationalizing_Performance \| See here for basic information about the adaptive profiles.]]</ref>, can be compared with the findings from Marston<ref>Marston W. M. (2002. Emotions of Normal People. Routledge. First published in 1928.</ref>, Burt<ref>Burt, C. L. (1950). The factorial study of emotions. In M. L. Reymert, Ed., Feelings and Emotions. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 531-551.</ref>, and Clarke<ref>Clarke W. V. (1956). Personality Profile of Self-Made Company Presidents. The Journal of Psychology. 41, p. 413-418.</ref> on the feelings and emotions of normal people. These factors also align with the dimensions identified in sociological studies, such as those of Parsons<ref>Parsons T. (1951). The Social System. New York: The Free Press.<br/>Parsons T. (1964). Social structure and personality. New York: The Free Press.</ref>, Parsons & Shils<ref>Parsons, T., Shils, E. A. (2001). Toward a general theory of action.: theoretical foundations for the social science. New York: The Free Press. First published in 1951.</ref>, and Katz & Khan<ref>Katz D., Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization. New York: Wiley. Originellement publié en 1966.</ref>. They were evidenced by studies on the five-factor approach conducted by Goldberg<ref>Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.</ref>, Costa & McCrae<ref>Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 13, p. 653-665.</ref>, Saucier, Thalmayer, and Payne<ref>Saucier, G., Thalmayer A. G., Payne D. L. (2010). A Basic Bivariate Structure of Personality Attributes Evident Across Nine Languages. Unpublished.</ref>, and other more recent studies on the optimal number of personality factors<ref>De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Timmerman, M. E., de Roover, K., Mlačić, B., Church, A. T. (2014). Towards a Pan-cultural Personality Structure: Input from 11 psychological Studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497-510.</ref>.

	=Disruptive Behaviors=		=Disruptive Behaviors=

Flc: /* Normative behaviors */

2025-08-27T20:19:19Z

Normative behaviors

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 27 August 2025
Line 32:		Line 32:
	For these normative behaviors, factor 4 is high (to the right of the profile), and factor 1 is low (to the left of the profile) and higher than factor 1 (to the right of factor 1). See Figure 3 below.		For these normative behaviors, factor 4 is high (to the right of the profile), and factor 1 is low (to the left of the profile) and higher than factor 1 (to the right of factor 1). See Figure 3 below.

	[[File:Normative Profile.png\|center\|~~280px~~]]		[[File:Normative Profile.png\|center\|250px]]
	<center>''Figure 3 – Normative Behavior''</center>		<center>''Figure 3 – Normative Behavior''</center>

Flc: /* Disruptive Behaviors */

2025-08-27T20:19:07Z

Disruptive Behaviors

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 27 August 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	For these disruptive behaviors, the profiles show a high factor 1 (to the right), a low factor 4 (to the left) lower than factor 1 (to the left of factor 1). Cf. Figure 1.		For these disruptive behaviors, the profiles show a high factor 1 (to the right), a low factor 4 (to the left) lower than factor 1 (to the left of factor 1). Cf. Figure 1.

	[[File:Disruptive Profile.png\|center\|~~280px~~]]		[[File:Disruptive Profile.png\|center\|250px]]
	<center>''Figure 1 - Disruptive Behavior.''</center>		<center>''Figure 1 - Disruptive Behavior.''</center>

Flc at 20:18, 27 August 2025

2025-08-27T20:18:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 27 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]		[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]

	This article aims to ~~give general~~ information on two fundamental tendencies of the ~~behavior~~ profiles ~~based on a factor approach~~: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.		This article aims to provide some information on two fundamental tendencies that can be read from the adaptive profiles: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.

	=Generalities=		=Generalities=

Flc at 20:13, 27 August 2025

2025-08-27T20:13:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 27 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|~~450px~~]]		[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|400px]]

	This article aims to give general information on two fundamental tendencies of the behavior profiles based on a factor approach: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.		This article aims to give general information on two fundamental tendencies of the behavior profiles based on a factor approach: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.

Flc at 20:11, 27 August 2025

2025-08-27T20:11:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 27 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|450px]]		[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|450px]]

	This article aims to give general information on two fundamental tendencies of the behavior profiles based on a factor approach: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains ~~information~~ that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.		This article aims to give general information on two fundamental tendencies of the behavior profiles based on a factor approach: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains GRI's terminology that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.

	~~GRI’s terminology is included in this article within brackets for those already familiar with it. For others, please ignore. It will display, such as [High 1] or [4>1]~~.

	=Generalities=		=Generalities=

Flc at 17:44, 27 August 2025

2025-08-27T17:44:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 27 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|450px]]		[[File:Performance_Individual.png\|right\|450px]]

	This article aims to give general information on two fundamental tendencies of the behavior profiles based on a factor approach: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains information that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.		This article aims to give general information on two fundamental tendencies of the behavior profiles based on a factor approach: normative behaviors versus disruptive behaviors. It contains information that requires a basic understanding of the adaptive profiles<ref>[[Performance_at_Heart\|See here for a brief definition of an adaptive profile and some key concepts it contains.]]</ref>.

	GRI’s terminology is included in this article within brackets for those already familiar with it. For others, please ignore. It will display, such as [High 1] or [4>1].		GRI’s terminology is included in this article within brackets for those already familiar with it. For others, please ignore. It will display, such as [High 1] or [4>1].