Organizational Performance Measurement - Revision history

Flc at 04:43, 11 December 2025

2025-12-11T04:43:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 11 December 2025
Line 90:		Line 90:

	[[Category:Articles]]		[[Category:Articles]]
			[[Category:Performance]]
	[[Category:General Framework]]		[[Category:General Framework]]

Flc: /* Economic Performance Indicators */

2025-12-11T04:40:34Z

Economic Performance Indicators

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:40, 11 December 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	=Economic Performance Indicators=		=Economic Performance Indicators=
	Performance ~~other than~~ the strategic and social performance ~~defined above~~ is ~~categorized under the label of~~ economic performance. ~~Economic performance~~ includes aspects related to finance, production, marketing ~~and~~ sales, and customer relations. It covers the three dimensions of Kaplan and Norton's balanced scorecard<ref>Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1998) The Balanced Scorecard. Organization Editions. Translation of the original 1996 edition: The balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action.</ref>: financial, customer, internal processes, and innovation~~; as well as~~ part of the fourth dimension of learning and growth. As long as the indicators are outside the performance measures ~~presented~~ in the strategic and social indicators above, they ~~remain~~ within the scope of economic performance. ~~The absenteeism rate~~ and staff turnover ~~rate~~, which can be translated into costs, are also included ~~in the~~ economic performance criteria.		Performance beyond the strategic and social performance outlined earlier is classified as economic performance. This includes aspects related to finance, production, marketing, sales, and customer relations. It covers the three dimensions of Kaplan and Norton's balanced scorecard<ref>Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1998) The Balanced Scorecard. Organization Editions. Translation of the original 1996 edition: The balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action.</ref>: financial, customer, internal processes, and innovation, along with part of the fourth dimension, learning and growth. As long as the indicators are outside the performance measures listed in the strategic and social indicators above, they fall within the scope of economic performance. Absenteeism and staff turnover rates, which can be translated into costs, are also included among economic performance criteria.

	Economic performance indicators should be broken down into as many indicators as ~~necessary~~, depending on the ~~situation~~. The measurement of economic performance is ~~then~~ represented by a variable ~~called~~ 'iopecon' (as the Objective Indicator of Economic Performance).		Economic performance indicators should be broken down into as many indicators as needed, depending on the context. The measurement of economic performance is represented by the variable 'iopecon' (the Objective Indicator of Economic Performance).

	=Types of performance=		=Types of performance=

Flc: /* Social Performance Indicators */

2025-12-11T04:37:49Z

Social Performance Indicators

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:37, 11 December 2025
Line 17:		Line 17:

	=Social Performance Indicators=		=Social Performance Indicators=
	The measures of adaptation and engagement enable us to evaluate the gap between what might be deemed satisfactory from an organizational perspective, whether agreed upon by stakeholders or not, and what manifests at the individual level in terms of personal effectiveness. The organization may desire certain behaviors, but these behaviors ~~might~~ require efforts that ~~cause~~ tension and reduce commitment, as ~~mentioned~~ in property 1 above.		The measures of adaptation and engagement enable us to evaluate the gap between what might be deemed satisfactory from an organizational perspective, whether agreed upon by stakeholders or not, and what manifests at the individual level in terms of personal effectiveness. The organization may desire certain behaviors, but these behaviors may require efforts that create tension and reduce commitment, as noted in property 1 above.

	This performance is referred to as social performance. It reflects consideration of people's expectations and values, a good fit between job ~~profiles~~ and personal profiles, a positive understanding of individual differences by management, self-awareness of ~~employees regarding~~ their capacities and talents, and proper adjustment of compensation and reward systems. The measure of social performance is ~~then~~ represented by a variable ~~called~~ 'iopsoc' (as the Objective Indicator of Social Performance).		This performance is referred to as social performance. It reflects consideration of people's expectations and values, a good fit between job and personal profiles, a positive understanding of individual differences by management, employees' self-awareness of their capacities and talents, and the proper adjustment of compensation and reward systems. The measure of social performance is represented by the variable 'iopsoc' (the Objective Indicator of Social Performance).

	=Economic Performance Indicators=		=Economic Performance Indicators=

Flc: /* Strategic Performance Indicators */

2025-12-11T04:35:48Z

Strategic Performance Indicators

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 11 December 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	=Strategic Performance Indicators=		=Strategic Performance Indicators=
			In fact, people consistently exhibit measurable social behaviors, preferences, and values. On the other hand, positions also have behavioral requirements that reflect the choices of the organization and its stakeholders. If the organization, its management, shareholders, pressure groups, etc., want efforts to be focused in a particular direction and in a relatively consistent and uniform manner, then this should occur. Conversely, if this is not the case, it suggests that management and recruitment efforts are not meeting their goals: behaviors are out of alignment with the objectives.

	~~In fact~~, ~~people consistently show specific social~~ behaviors, ~~preferences~~, ~~and values that~~ can be measured~~. On~~ the ~~other hand,~~ positions ~~also have their behavioral requirements~~, ~~which express~~ the ~~choices~~ of the ~~organization and its stakeholders~~. ~~It is logical~~ to ~~think that if~~ the organization, its management, shareholders, pressure groups, etc., want efforts to be focused in a certain way, direction, and in a relatively consistent and uniform manner, then this should actually happen. Conversely, if this is not the case, it suggests that the efforts in management and selection are not meeting their goals: behaviors are out of ~~sync with the objectives~~.		By comparing actual behaviors of individuals with desired behaviors at the position level, the organization can assess and manage the relationship between actors' behaviors and the organization’s needs, using the same behavioral dimensions. In practice, the difference can be measured between the behaviors described by the PBI (Position Behavior Indicator) profiles of positions and the actual behaviors of people, as shown in the Effective graph of the GRI adaptive profile. The gap between these indicates which actions should be taken to maximize the effectiveness of social behavior at each position.

	By comparing actual behaviors of people with the desired behaviors at the position level, the organization can assess and manage the relationship between the behaviors of its actors and the organization’s needs, based on the same behavioral dimensions. In practice, the difference can be measured between the behaviors described by the PBI (Position Behavior Indicator) profiles of the positions and the actual people’s behaviors, as shown in the Effective graph of the GRI profile. The gap between these indicates what actions should be taken to maximize behavioral effectiveness at each position.		This performance is called strategic because understanding how to do things across all positions at every level is crucial when setting goals, planning, and controlling. The ways of selecting personnel, implementing processes, innovating, managing change, taking risks, defending, and gaining market share—highlighted by the adaptive profiles—shape how the organization functions. They involve decisions that are hard to reverse at the highest levels of hierarchy. The measurement of strategic performance is operationalized as the variable 'iopstra' (the Objective Indicator of Strategic Performance).

	This performance is called strategic because understanding how to do things across all positions at every level is crucial when setting goals, planning, and controlling. The ways of selecting personnel, implementing processes, innovating, managing change, taking risks, defending, and gaining market ~~share—all highlighted~~ by the adaptive ~~profiles—affect~~ how the organization functions. They involve decisions that are hard to reverse at the highest levels of hierarchy. The measurement of strategic performance is ~~then identified by a~~ variable ~~called~~ 'iopstra' (as the Objective Indicator of Strategic Performance).

	=Social Performance Indicators=		=Social Performance Indicators=

Flc at 04:28, 11 December 2025

2025-12-11T04:28:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 11 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Introduction=
	[[File:GRI_Model_dep_variables.png\|right\|450px]]		[[File:GRI_Model_dep_variables.png\|right\|450px]]

	Adaptive profiles, as measured at GRI, indicate how individuals function and how their environment influences their ability to adapt, engage, and perform. Once aggregated, these profiles also illustrate the overall behavior of a team, department, or company. They help identify organizational weaknesses by considering not only the organization’s internal requirements, but also its industry and market needs, and the various adaptive profiles of its stakeholders. This article explains how strategic and social performance indicators are built and used in conjunction with other, more traditional indicators.		Adaptive profiles, as measured at GRI, indicate how individuals function and how their environment influences their ability to adapt, engage, and perform. Once aggregated, these profiles also illustrate the overall behavior of a team, department, or company. They help identify organizational weaknesses by considering not only the organization’s internal requirements, but also its industry and market needs, and the various adaptive profiles of its stakeholders. This article explains how strategic and social performance indicators are built and used in conjunction with other, more traditional indicators.

Flc at 04:28, 11 December 2025

2025-12-11T04:28:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 11 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:

	[[File:GRI_Model_dep_variables.png\|right\|450px]]		[[File:GRI_Model_dep_variables.png\|right\|450px]]

	GRI ~~adaptive profiles measure~~ how individuals function and how their environment influences their ability to adapt, engage, and perform. Once aggregated, these profiles also illustrate the overall behavior of a team, department, or company. They help identify organizational weaknesses by considering not only the organization’s internal requirements, but also its industry and market needs, and the various adaptive profiles of its stakeholders. This article ~~introduces~~ how ~~the~~ strategic and social performance indicators are built and used in conjunction with other, more traditional indicators.		Adaptive profiles, as measured at GRI, indicate how individuals function and how their environment influences their ability to adapt, engage, and perform. Once aggregated, these profiles also illustrate the overall behavior of a team, department, or company. They help identify organizational weaknesses by considering not only the organization’s internal requirements, but also its industry and market needs, and the various adaptive profiles of its stakeholders. This article explains how strategic and social performance indicators are built and used in conjunction with other, more traditional indicators.

	=Construction of Performance Indicators=		=Construction of Performance Indicators=

Flc: /* Construction of Performance Indicators */

2025-12-11T04:26:06Z

Construction of Performance Indicators

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 11 December 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	=Construction of Performance Indicators=		=Construction of Performance Indicators=

	The unique properties of ~~GRI’s metrics~~ enable a precise understanding of people’s performance in context. Two key properties of ~~these~~ metrics are incorporated into the construction of performance indicators that can then be used at a group level. In summary, they are the following:		The unique properties of the adaptive profiles enable a precise understanding of people’s performance in context. Two key properties of their metrics are incorporated into the construction of performance indicators that can then be used at a group level. In summary, they are the following:
	* '''Property 1''': ~~GRI’s metrics~~ effectively indicate the level of involvement, engagement, and effectiveness ~~of individuals~~ within their environment. Low adaptation combined with high engagement suggests that people are in roles that align with their values, expectations, interests, and ~~behavioral~~ preferences. Conversely, high adaptation and low engagement ~~point to~~ disengagement, demotivation, and negative emotions among individuals in their ~~positions~~. These adaptation and engagement ~~levels~~ reflect either a mismatch between a person’s ~~behavioral~~ values and their position or ineffective personal development.		* '''Property 1''': Adaptive profiles effectively indicate the level of individuals' involvement, engagement, and effectiveness within their environment. Low adaptation combined with high engagement suggests that people are in roles that align with their values, expectations, interests, and social behavior preferences. Conversely, high adaptation and low engagement indicate disengagement, demotivation, and negative emotions among individuals in their roles. These levels of adaptation and engagement reflect either a mismatch between a person’s social behavior values and their position, or ineffective personal development.
	* '''Property 2''': ~~GRI’s metrics~~, including their factors, scales, indicators, and profiles, offer a detailed view of people’s performance, encompassing behaviors, values, preferences, styles, interests, and more. This view is based on both how people behave and how they think and feel about those behaviors. Our best estimate at GRI is that the profiles capture up to 90% of people’s behaviors across the short, medium, and long term. The intensity of these behaviors is influenced by ~~the effects of~~ Property 1 above. As a result, we not only gain a better understanding of how people function, but also ~~the approximate interval in which~~ their behaviors are likely to be expressed.		* '''Property 2''': Adaptive profiles, including their factors, scales, indicators, and profiles, offer a detailed view of people’s performance, encompassing social behaviors, values, preferences, styles, interests, and more. This view is based on both how people behave and how they think and feel about those social behaviors. Our best estimate at GRI is that the profiles capture up to 90% of people’s social behaviors across the short, medium, and long term. The intensity of these behaviors is influenced by Property 1 above. As a result, we not only gain a better understanding of how people function but also when their social behaviors are likely to be expressed.

	=Strategic Performance Indicators=		=Strategic Performance Indicators=

Flc: /* Deployment of the Measures */

2025-12-11T04:18:54Z

Deployment of the Measures

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 11 December 2025
Line 76:		Line 76:
	=Deployment of the Measures=		=Deployment of the Measures=

	The adaptive profiles show how people perform best and how they adjust to their environment. The development of the two indicators 'iopstra' and 'iopsoc' reflects the ~~idea of the~~ overall performance of the ~~organization on~~ strategic and social levels.		The adaptive profiles show how people perform best and how they adjust to their environment. The development of the two indicators 'iopstra' and 'iopsoc' reflects the organization's overall performance at the strategic and social levels.

	~~<ul>~~		* The indicator 'iopsoc' measures how stakeholders’ satisfaction and involvement evolve over time.
	~~<li>~~The indicator 'iopsoc' measures how stakeholders’ satisfaction and involvement evolve over time.~~</li>~~		* The indicator 'iopstra' measures how the strategy is reached as set with the TBI indicators for the teams, departments, and the organization.
	~~<li>~~The indicator 'iopstra' measures how the strategy is reached as set with the TBI indicators for the teams, departments, and the organization.~~</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~

	The profiles enable performance measurement that closely tracks the development of the two indicators 'iopsta' and 'iopsoc' over time, aligning as ~~much~~ as possible with where the measures are applied: at the individual level with the adaptive profile and at the management level ~~in charge of~~ executing the strategy.		The profiles enable performance measurement that closely tracks the development of the two indicators 'iopsta' and 'iopsoc' over time, aligning as closely as possible with where the measures are applied: at the individual level with the adaptive profile and at the management level responsible for executing the strategy.

			Given the rapid pace of change and organizational complexity, it is essential to reduce non-performance, as indicated by the indicators 'iopstra' and 'iopsoc'. It’s unrealistic to expect that all stakeholders' adaptive profiles will perfectly align with the expectations of their roles, as reflected in the strategic performance indicator ‘iopstra’, or that all social performance indicators will reach their maximum levels, as shown by the social performance indicator ‘iopsoc’.

	Given the rapid pace of change and complexity in organizations, it is essential to reduce non-performance, which can be revealed by the indicators 'iopstra' and 'iopsoc'. It’s unrealistic to expect that all stakeholders' adaptive profiles will perfectly align with the expectations of their roles, as reflected in the strategic performance indicator ‘iopstra’, or that all social performance indicators will reach their maximum levels, as shown by the social performance indicator ‘iopsoc’.		Excessive adaptation and disengagement, which come with negative emotions, are undesirable. As management research shows, providing feedback to team members and training for managers helps both parties take ownership of the measures.

	Excessive adaptation and disengagement, which ~~can lead to~~ negative emotions, are undesirable. As management research shows, providing feedback to team members and training for managers helps both parties take ownership of the measures.

	Decentralizing adaptive profiles to operations enables strategy implementation as close as possible to where decisions are made and actions are taken, ensuring that measures and information best serve the organization and its members at various levels. When incorporated into performance reviews, these measures motivate teams and facilitate organizational change. Ultimately, individual and unit-level measures can be integrated into a management control system to ensure that performance targets are met.		Decentralizing adaptive profiles to operations enables strategy implementation as close as possible to where decisions are made and actions are taken, ensuring that measures and information best serve the organization and its members at various levels. When incorporated into performance reviews, these measures motivate teams and facilitate organizational change. Ultimately, individual and unit-level measures can be integrated into a management control system to ensure that performance targets are met.

Flc: /* Deployment of the Measures */

2025-12-11T04:14:18Z

Deployment of the Measures

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 11 December 2025
Line 89:		Line 89:
	Excessive adaptation and disengagement, which can lead to negative emotions, are undesirable. As management research shows, providing feedback to team members and training for managers helps both parties take ownership of the measures.		Excessive adaptation and disengagement, which can lead to negative emotions, are undesirable. As management research shows, providing feedback to team members and training for managers helps both parties take ownership of the measures.

	Decentralizing adaptive profiles to operations enables strategy implementation as close as possible to where decisions are made and actions are taken, ensuring that measures and information best serve the organization and its members at various levels. When incorporated into performance reviews, these measures motivate teams and facilitate organizational change. Ultimately, individual and unit-level measures can be integrated into a management control system to ensure performance targets are met.		Decentralizing adaptive profiles to operations enables strategy implementation as close as possible to where decisions are made and actions are taken, ensuring that measures and information best serve the organization and its members at various levels. When incorporated into performance reviews, these measures motivate teams and facilitate organizational change. Ultimately, individual and unit-level measures can be integrated into a management control system to ensure that performance targets are met.

	=Notes=		=Notes=

Flc: /* Pending Performance */

2025-12-11T04:12:35Z

Pending Performance

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:12, 11 December 2025
Line 56:		Line 56:
	If only the social and strategic performances improve positively, we can classify this as a 'pending performance.' This indicates that people are more engaged and satisfied, with social behavior more aligned with the strategy, but the economic objectives have not yet been achieved.		If only the social and strategic performances improve positively, we can classify this as a 'pending performance.' This indicates that people are more engaged and satisfied, with social behavior more aligned with the strategy, but the economic objectives have not yet been achieved.

	This scenario is categorized under the first 'optimal performance' as a special case. The organization is ~~waiting for~~ economic ~~results, but without this negatively impacting~~ stakeholders. The economic objectives might not have been realistic, yet the organization remains committed. 'iopsoc' is up, 'iopstra' is up, 'iopecon' is not achieved.		This scenario is categorized under the first 'optimal performance' as a special case. The organization is awaiting economic outcomes while avoiding adverse effects on stakeholders. The economic objectives might not have been realistic, yet the organization remains committed. 'iopsoc' is up, 'iopstra' is up, 'iopecon' is not achieved.

	===Lack of performance===		===Lack of performance===