<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference_Checks</id>
	<title>Reference Checks - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference_Checks"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?title=Reference_Checks&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-25T23:19:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?title=Reference_Checks&amp;diff=1739&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Flc: /* Using the Adaptive Profiles with Reference Checks */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?title=Reference_Checks&amp;diff=1739&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-09-28T03:17:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Using the Adaptive Profiles with Reference Checks&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 03:17, 28 September 2025&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l14&quot;&gt;Line 14:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 14:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Using the Adaptive Profiles with Reference Checks=&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Using the Adaptive Profiles with Reference Checks=&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Having &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;the &lt;/del&gt;adaptive profile &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;of a candidate in hand &lt;/del&gt;before conducting a reference check allows for &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;moderating &lt;/del&gt;the information &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;from the reference check&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;better &lt;/del&gt;understanding how the candidate &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;accomplished &lt;/del&gt;previous results, and asking &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;new &lt;/del&gt;questions. Instead of &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;relying &lt;/del&gt;on third parties&amp;#039; limited views of key personality characteristics, it &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;enables gathering &lt;/del&gt;information to better &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;understand &lt;/del&gt;how the candidate will perform &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;and grow &lt;/del&gt;in the role.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Having &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;a candidate&amp;#039;s &lt;/ins&gt;adaptive profile &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;available &lt;/ins&gt;before conducting a reference check allows for &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;guiding &lt;/ins&gt;the information &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;collected&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;gaining a clearer &lt;/ins&gt;understanding &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;of &lt;/ins&gt;how the candidate &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;achieved &lt;/ins&gt;previous results, and asking &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;more informed &lt;/ins&gt;questions &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;to the third party&lt;/ins&gt;. Instead of &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;depending &lt;/ins&gt;on third parties&amp;#039; limited views of key personality characteristics, it &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;helps gather &lt;/ins&gt;information to better &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;assess &lt;/ins&gt;how the candidate will perform in the role.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Notes=&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Notes=&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key my_wiki:diff::1.12:old-1738:rev-1739 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Flc</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?title=Reference_Checks&amp;diff=1738&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Flc: Created page with &quot;=Introduction= 400px Reference checks are a technique used to gather information about a candidate from a third party. The goal is to verify details provided by the candidate, such as degrees or previous employment, and to get the opinion of someone who knows the candidate well. According to SRHM, reference checks are a common practice as a screening and selection tool for 92% of organizations in the US. It is frequently used for...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.gri.co/index.php?title=Reference_Checks&amp;diff=1738&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-09-28T03:14:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;=Introduction= &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/File:Performance_Individual.png&quot; title=&quot;File:Performance Individual.png&quot;&gt;right|400px&lt;/a&gt; Reference checks are a technique used to gather information about a candidate from a third party. The goal is to verify details provided by the candidate, such as degrees or previous employment, and to get the opinion of someone who knows the candidate well. According to SRHM, reference checks are a common practice as a screening and selection tool for 92% of organizations in the US. It is frequently used for...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Performance_Individual.png|right|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Reference checks are a technique used to gather information about a candidate from a third party. The goal is to verify details provided by the candidate, such as degrees or previous employment, and to get the opinion of someone who knows the candidate well. According to SRHM, reference checks are a common practice as a screening and selection tool for 92% of organizations in the US. It is frequently used for managerial and executive positions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Critics=&lt;br /&gt;
Reference checks may raise more concerns than other techniques about preventing biases, impartiality, and ethics. Especially when using AI, enforcing non-discriminatory practices can be more difficult. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that the most frequently requested opinion dimensions are personality, honesty, and social traits. Using factor analysis on 625 reference letters, a study identified 170 descriptive adjectives, which were then grouped into five factors: Cooperation-Consideration, Mental Agility, Dependability-Reliability, Urbanity, and Vigor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peres S. H., Garcia, J. R. (1962). Validity and dimensions of descriptive adjectives used in reference letters for engineering applicants, Personnal Psychology, 15, 279-286.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. People who give referrals often follow social rules of tolerance and leniency. The expressions used by third parties when they want to indicate that the candidate is poorly qualified are very limited (like saying &amp;#039;a good boy!&amp;#039;). The people providing references do not always know what is expected of them. The validity of predictions from reference checks is uniformly low. However, the best validity, while remaining low, is usually obtained by the candidates’ direct superior&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munchinsky, P. M. (1979). The use of reference reports in personnel selection: a review and evaluation, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 287-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By calculating correlations based on information provided by several third parties for multiple candidates, a study was able to find strong correlations between the references given by the same third party for different candidates. The correlation of references on the same candidate across several third parties is not as strong, suggesting that referencing may reveal more about the third party than about the candidates&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baxter, J. C., Brock, B., Hill, P. C., Rozell, R. M. (1981). Letters of recommendations: a question of value, Journal of Applied Psychologie, 66, 296-301.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Better results for reference checks can be achieved by structuring the search for information from third parties. By creating lists of behavior descriptions, a study obtained a validity of 0.64 between references and notations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caroll, S. J., Nash, A. N. (1972). Effectiveness of a forced-choice reference check, Personnel Administration, 35, 42-46.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Using the Adaptive Profiles with Reference Checks=&lt;br /&gt;
Having the adaptive profile of a candidate in hand before conducting a reference check allows for moderating the information from the reference check, better understanding how the candidate accomplished previous results, and asking new questions. Instead of relying on third parties&amp;#039; limited views of key personality characteristics, it enables gathering information to better understand how the candidate will perform and grow in the role. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Notes=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Assessment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Flc</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>