What Keeps Them Apart - Revision history

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-10T18:09:43Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 10 March 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated ~~by considering~~ how close we are to ~~some~~ locations on the map. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated based on how close we are to certain locations on the map. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-10T18:07:20Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 10 March 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by considering how ~~distant~~ we are to some locations on the map. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by considering how close we are to some locations on the map. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-10T18:06:13Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 10 March 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by ~~recouping small areas~~ on the map~~. One knows we are more or less distant from it~~. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by considering how distant we are to some locations on the map. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-09T04:48:43Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 9 March 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The ~~Trait~~ model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The ~~Type~~ model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|}		\|}

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-09T04:48:06Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 9 March 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The Trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The Trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B.<ref>The Type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>		\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B<ref>The Type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|}		\|}

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-09T04:47:44Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 9 March 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	! width=15%" \| Model !! Description		! width=15%" \| Model !! Description
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to ~~cover distances~~ from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to travel from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated<ref>The Trait model is discussed with more details[[Trait_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B.		\| align="center" \| [[Type_Model \|Type]] \|\| Being regrouped in broad categories, behavior on the map appears as large areas. This makes it impossible to predict the distances to cover between A and B.<ref>The Type model is discussed with more details[[Type_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>
	\|}		\|}

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-09T04:44:06Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 9 March 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	! width=15%" \| Model !! Description		! width=15%" \| Model !! Description
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor~~<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>~~]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to cover distances from A to B on the map can be anticipated.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to cover distances from A to B on the map can be anticipated<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated.

Flc: /* The Three Models */

2026-03-09T04:43:26Z

The Three Models

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 9 March 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	! width=15%" \| Model !! Description		! width=15%" \| Model !! Description
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to cover distances from A to B on the map can be anticipated.		\| align="center" \| [[Factor_Model \| Factor<ref>The factor model is discussed with more details[[Factor_Model \| in this article here.]]</ref>]] \|\| Behavior is precisely measured by its coordinates on the map. The distance and effort required to cover distances from A to B on the map can be anticipated.
	\|-		\|-
	\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated.		\| align="center" \| [[Trait_Model \| Trait]] \|\| Behavior is estimated by recouping small areas on the map. One knows we are more or less distant from it. Distances to be covered to go from A to B can only be roughly estimated.

Flc: /* Measurement */

2026-03-09T04:28:55Z

Measurement

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 9 March 2026
Line 60:		Line 60:
	The preferred technique for measuring social behavior is the questionnaire. However, in our analysis, we had to differentiate the techniques that are forced scenarios from those that are free scenarios. In the first case, forced-scenarios, the items are propositions that invite the participant to score on a five- to ten-point Likert scale, depending on the technique. In the latter case, the free-scenarios, the technique leaves the participant free to choose the situation or scenario associated with the items to be selected or rejected. The items are typically adjectives. We used to refer to free versus forced-choice techniques, but the distinction using “choice” was limited to a few techniques only (namely, DISC-like techniques). The other expression used was “projective,” which, in psychoanalysis, refers to the unconscious self and to items that people unconsciously describe, such as inkblots. But this distinction was inappropriate in our context.		The preferred technique for measuring social behavior is the questionnaire. However, in our analysis, we had to differentiate the techniques that are forced scenarios from those that are free scenarios. In the first case, forced-scenarios, the items are propositions that invite the participant to score on a five- to ten-point Likert scale, depending on the technique. In the latter case, the free-scenarios, the technique leaves the participant free to choose the situation or scenario associated with the items to be selected or rejected. The items are typically adjectives. We used to refer to free versus forced-choice techniques, but the distinction using “choice” was limited to a few techniques only (namely, DISC-like techniques). The other expression used was “projective,” which, in psychoanalysis, refers to the unconscious self and to items that people unconsciously describe, such as inkblots. But this distinction was inappropriate in our context.

	The techniques that have adopted the free scenario strategy, which there are a dozen on the market in the 2020s, and which is the one adopted at GRI, have enabled measuring adaptation and engagement levels in addition to behavior. It has also helped measure and distinguish between Natural, Role, and Effective behaviors, which other techniques that use the force scenario approach don’t<ref>See [[Adaptive_Profile \| here a brief definition of the Natural, Role and Effective profiles]] which are regrouped in the adaptive profile.</ref>.		The techniques that have adopted the free scenario strategy, which there are a dozen on the market in the 2020s, and which is the one adopted at GRI, have enabled measuring adaptation and engagement levels in addition to behavior. It has also helped measure and distinguish between Natural, Role, and Effective behaviors, which other techniques that use the force scenario approach don’t<ref>See [[Adaptive_Profile \| here a brief definition of the Natural, Role, and Effective profiles]] which are regrouped in the adaptive profile.</ref>.

	Interestingly, it is the free-scenario strategy that has helped the factor approach to personality emerge. Then the fixed-scenario took over for measuring the factors being evidenced. The fixed-scenario naturally led to measuring traits and types, and does not take the environment into account ~~the same way that the~~ techniques using the free-scenario strategy do.		Interestingly, it is the free-scenario strategy that has helped the factor approach to personality emerge. Then the fixed-scenario took over for measuring the factors being evidenced. The fixed-scenario naturally led to measuring traits and types and does not take the environment into account, unlike techniques using the free-scenario strategy.

	=Representation=		=Representation=

Flc: /* Measurement */

2026-03-09T04:25:08Z

Measurement

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 9 March 2026
Line 58:		Line 58:

	=Measurement=		=Measurement=
	The preferred technique for measuring social behavior is the questionnaire. However, in our analysis, we had to differentiate the techniques that are forced scenarios from those that are free scenarios.		The preferred technique for measuring social behavior is the questionnaire. However, in our analysis, we had to differentiate the techniques that are forced scenarios from those that are free scenarios. In the first case, forced-scenarios, the items are propositions that invite the participant to score on a five- to ten-point Likert scale, depending on the technique. In the latter case, the free-scenarios, the technique leaves the participant free to choose the situation or scenario associated with the items to be selected or rejected. The items are typically adjectives. We used to refer to free versus forced-choice techniques, but the distinction using “choice” was limited to a few techniques only (namely, DISC-like techniques). The other expression used was “projective,” which, in psychoanalysis, refers to the unconscious self and to items that people unconsciously describe, such as inkblots. But this distinction was inappropriate in our context.

	In the first case, forced-scenarios, the items are propositions that invite the participant to score on a five- to ten-point Likert scale, depending on the technique. In the latter case, the free-scenarios, the technique leaves the participant free to choose the situation or scenario associated with the items to be selected or rejected. The items are typically adjectives. We used to refer to free versus forced-choice techniques, but the distinction using “choice” was limited to a few techniques only (namely, DISC-like techniques). The other expression used was “projective,” which, in psychoanalysis, refers to the unconscious self and to items that people unconsciously describe, such as inkblots. But this distinction was inappropriate in our context.

	The techniques that have adopted the free scenario strategy, which there are a dozen on the market in the 2020s, and which is the one adopted at GRI, have enabled measuring adaptation and engagement levels in addition to behavior. It has also helped measure and distinguish between Natural, Role, and Effective behaviors, which other techniques that use the force scenario approach don’t<ref>See [[Adaptive_Profile \| here a brief definition of the Natural, Role and Effective profiles]] which are regrouped in the adaptive profile.</ref>.		The techniques that have adopted the free scenario strategy, which there are a dozen on the market in the 2020s, and which is the one adopted at GRI, have enabled measuring adaptation and engagement levels in addition to behavior. It has also helped measure and distinguish between Natural, Role, and Effective behaviors, which other techniques that use the force scenario approach don’t<ref>See [[Adaptive_Profile \| here a brief definition of the Natural, Role and Effective profiles]] which are regrouped in the adaptive profile.</ref>.