Anticipated Conclusions

From Growth Resources
Revision as of 22:11, 10 December 2025 by Flc (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Introduction= Based on observations of the use of an assessment technique by its user and measurements of the variables’ indicators over time, it is possible to validate or reject the hypotheses. The validation conditions for the hypothesis are specified below<ref>See here to learn more about how the hypotheses, and here about the criteria being used to define them.</ref>. To test the general framework, the antec...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Introduction

Based on observations of the use of an assessment technique by its user and measurements of the variables’ indicators over time, it is possible to validate or reject the hypotheses. The validation conditions for the hypothesis are specified below[1].

To test the general framework, the antecedent variables must be specified and measured, such as the user's role, the technique used, the company, and the publisher's distribution model for the assessment technique[2].

With the first framework, the focus was on leaders and managers; the assessment technique used was a factor approach, in the same category of techniques assessing social behavior as the GRI technique. The tested environments were two companies called Qualibank and Posini[3].

Other hypotheses can be added using the same methodology, leveraging the variables and indicators already defined. The hypotheses and anticipated conclusions presented below for the general framework apply similarly to the first framework designed in Step 1.