Indicators and Their Measurement: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This article specifies the codes, indicators, and value attributions for the general framework’s variables. Nine are independent variables, four are antecedent variables, and three are dependent variables. The 16 variables are presented in this order below. | This article specifies the codes, indicators, and value attributions for the general framework’s variables. Nine are independent variables, four are antecedent variables, and three are dependent variables. The 16 variables are presented in this order below. | ||
The framework, its construction, and variables are presented in separate articles<ref>[[ Framework Variables and Indicators | See | The framework, its construction, and variables are presented in separate articles<ref>[[ Framework Variables and Indicators | See more about the framework and variables here in this article.]]<br/>[[ Research Methodology | See more about the history of the framework and its methodology here in this article.]]</ref>. | ||
=Independent Variables= | =Independent Variables= | ||
Revision as of 06:33, 8 December 2025
Introduction
This article specifies the codes, indicators, and value attributions for the general framework’s variables. Nine are independent variables, four are antecedent variables, and three are dependent variables. The 16 variables are presented in this order below.
The framework, its construction, and variables are presented in separate articles[1].
Independent Variables
(O) Organizational Development
Applications of assessment techniques in organizational development, such as defining job expectations and the organization at a strategic level, as well as in mergers and acquisitions, are associated with the concept of 'Use in organizational development'. The more varied and intense the use at the organizational level, the more it is associated with positive effects on performance. Seven indicators are used to measure the 'Use in organisational development’ variable, each with an ordinal scale of four values: very low, low, strong, and very strong. They combine to form an overall indicator called 'isuorga.'
If any single indicator is very strong, it is enough to determine that 'isuorga' is very strong. If no factor is very strong and at least one factor is strong, then 'isuorga' is strong. If no factor is very strong or strong and at least one factor is low, then 'isuorga' is low. In other cases, we will say that 'isuorga' is very low.