16PF: Difference between revisions

From GRI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 53: Line 53:


==Comments==
==Comments==
The 16 factors emerged from factorial analyses that the 16PF’s author R. Cattell calculated at a time when computers and software were not yet available. The same factorial analyses were computed later in the 1990s by Digman (1996), who evidenced 7 factors instead of 16, raising some doubts about the validity of the 16PF. The 16PF5 version emerged later as more consistent, theoretically solid, and in line with more recent research on the BIG5.
The 16 factors emerged from factorial analyses that the 16PF’s author R. Cattell calculated at a time when computers and software were not yet available. The same factorial analyses were computed later in the 1990s by Digman (1996), who evidenced 7 factors instead of 16, raising some doubts about the validity of the 16PF. The 16PF5 version emerged later as more consistent, theoretically solid, and in line with recent research on the Big Five.


The use of the 16PF is generally more clinical than organizational. 16PF was popular among psychologists in the 1970th and 1980th. Utilizations started to decrease at the end of the 1990th in favor of more recent tests coming from the BIG5 approach research, such as the NEO-PI or the FFM. The popularity of the 16PF was undoubtedly related to its author, who was a renowned researcher and an active writer and speaker.
The use of the 16PF is generally more clinical than organizational. The 16PF was popular among psychologists in the 1970th and 1980th. Utilizations started to decrease at the end of the 1990th in favor of more recent tests coming from the Big Five approach research, such as the NEO-PI or the FFM. The popularity of the 16PF was undoubtedly related to its author, who was a renowned researcher and an active writer and speaker.


The 16PF has inspired the development of many other tests, like the Guilford Zimmerman Temperament Survey (GZTS). With a large number of items to be checked and a number of measured traits greater than a dozen, other well-known assessments like OPQ or HPI can also be classified as close to the 16PF.
The 16PF has inspired the development of many other tests, like the Guilford Zimmerman Temperament Survey (GZTS). With a large number of items to be checked and a number of measured traits greater than a dozen, other well-known assessments like OPQ or HPI can also be classified as close to the 16PF.

Revision as of 04:45, 9 February 2025

Generalities

The 16PF is a personality assessment developed by R.B. Cattell. Its first version was published in 1949, followed by subsequent versions in 1956, 1962, and 1968. A fifth version, the 16PF5, was published in 1993 and is still used today. The assessment has been translated into many languages and there are plenty of psychometric studies available on it.

Taking the 16PF takes over an hour and it's mainly used by psychologists in counseling, and clinical situations. The 16PF5 version added five new dimensions (EX, AX, TM, IN, SC) to keep up with BIG5 research. The 16+5 dimensions measured by the 16PF are listed in the table below.

16PF5 Factors table
Factor Title Low High
Factor A Warmth Reserved, Distant Warm, Outgoing
Factor B Reasoning Concrete Abstract
Factor C Emotional Stability Reactive Adaptive
Factor E Dominance Deferential, Cooperative Assertive, Dominant
Factor F Liveliness Serious, Restrained Animated, Spontaneous
Factor G Rule-Consciousness Expedient, Nonconforming Rule-conscious, Dutiful
Factor H Social Boldness Threat sensitive, Timid Venturesome, Think-skinned
Factor I Sensitivity Utilitarian, Objective Sensitive, Sentimental
Factor L Vigilance Trusting, Unsuspecting Skeptical, Wary
Factor M Abstractedness Grounded, Practical Imaginative, Idea-oriented
Factor N Privateness Forthright, Genuine Discreet, Non-disclosing
Factor O Self-assured, Complacent Worried, Self-doubting
Factor Q1 Openness to change Traditional, Attached to familiar Experimenting
Factor Q2 Self-reliance Group-oriented Solitary, Individualistic
Factor Q3 Perfectionism Unexacting, Flexible Organized, Self-disciplined
Factor Q4 Tension High-energy, Impatient
Factor EX Extraversion Socially inhibited Socially participating
Factor AX Anxiety Low Anxiety, unperturbed High anxiety
Factor TM Tough minded Receptive, intuitive Resolute, un-empathetic
Factor IN Independence Agreeable, Selfless persuasive, Willful
Factor SC Self-control Unrestrained, follows urges Inhibit urges

Comments

The 16 factors emerged from factorial analyses that the 16PF’s author R. Cattell calculated at a time when computers and software were not yet available. The same factorial analyses were computed later in the 1990s by Digman (1996), who evidenced 7 factors instead of 16, raising some doubts about the validity of the 16PF. The 16PF5 version emerged later as more consistent, theoretically solid, and in line with recent research on the Big Five.

The use of the 16PF is generally more clinical than organizational. The 16PF was popular among psychologists in the 1970th and 1980th. Utilizations started to decrease at the end of the 1990th in favor of more recent tests coming from the Big Five approach research, such as the NEO-PI or the FFM. The popularity of the 16PF was undoubtedly related to its author, who was a renowned researcher and an active writer and speaker.

The 16PF has inspired the development of many other tests, like the Guilford Zimmerman Temperament Survey (GZTS). With a large number of items to be checked and a number of measured traits greater than a dozen, other well-known assessments like OPQ or HPI can also be classified as close to the 16PF.

References

More on Catell and the 16PF in encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/medicine/psychology-and-psychiatry-biographies/raymond-bernard-cattell

More on the 16PF in Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=16PF&btnG=Search

More details about the critique of the 16PF in : Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-20). New York, NY: Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781572300682.

More on the 16 PF in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16PF_Questionnaire